55 Comments
User's avatar
Yahya Abdal-Aziz's avatar

Jonathan, thanks for a _very_ insightful newsletter email. :)

But you have me intrigued ... you wrote:

"... the single most important book I’ve written, and may ever write, took four years to craft 18,908 words, was published by me, and has a single copy in print. That’s all it took to say what I needed to say."

What is that book? And why just the one copy?!

Expand full comment
Heather Hoskison's avatar

I think that's the reason why I'm drawn here, to substack. If I'm in a notes mood I'll scroll through the notes if I'm in a reading mood I'll scroll through some of the articles. And if I get into an article and I get bored halfway through guess what I close it and walk away. But there's a little bit of everything here.

It's nice to get your take on the subject though where you've been on both ends of it as a professional writer for those of us who are still trying to figure out what we're writing and why and how we're going to share it.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

Interesting observation, Heather. I've actually found myself increasingly getting lost in Notes, and reading far fewer longform essays here. Not a shift I feel great about, tbh. So, I'm trying to pay more attention to the fuller works. But, like you, if it doesn't hold me, I still tap out pretty early.

Expand full comment
Ruth W. Feldman's avatar

I am reminded of "The Yuppie Handbook" - 125 pages, sitting at the check-out counter - bought by millions just for a quick laugh. Remember that? I'm all in for shorter more concise self-help. And as if it's possible to ignore - AI self-help is all about the summary and the publishing industry has to compete with that. In my opinion, you are right-on in questioning the long-standing format...

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

Such an interesting point, Ruth. I think many people are now using AI to tell summarize the salient points from popular advice books, so they can just get to the doing part.

Expand full comment
Leah Kruger's avatar

Super interesting — I love the honesty (honesty always makes me feel less alone, even if I’m not a writer!).

Also funny that “heft” is such a factor when I buy 99% of my books in e-form (Kindle, audible, etc) and never even glance at the page count since “pages” would depend on your font-size settings 😅

But maybe what most resonates was your point that just a single line can change your entire life. Isn’t that, in all its simple truth, why we keep reading?

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

A single line can, indeed, change a life, or at least a moment or season or day, Leah. Love the observation about heft and digital, too. Interestingly, the concept extends to audiobooks, too. Especially with audible dominating the market, and most people paying in credits, rather than money. As a general rule, the audiobook needs to be at least 5-6 hours long in order to meet the digital equivalent of heft and motivate someone to spend one of their credits on it. So, publishers don't like to produce shorter books. And, I'd bet many folks do look at page count when buying ebooks too.

Expand full comment
SkyDancer's avatar

It's what happens when making money eclipses the craft of writing. Setting that aside however, the explosion of self-help books that say nothing new and should have been a tenet growing up is depressing.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

It's a great question. And I don't think it has to be a pitted battle. Many in traditional publishing really do care about creating great work, and make great books. It's just that they're still operating within the context of a larger model that, in order to survive, needs to make decisions that are based on both the quality of the book, and the economic viability of the publisher.

Expand full comment
Rex Williams's avatar

Awesome insight and POV. I'm thinking there is a market for a new kind of publisher, one that helps people 'self-publish'. They just do all the pretty easy stuff (for some people) that gets the book published on Amazon. It removes the admin stuff a writer may not be interested in. Sure, you couldn't charge much, but it would be something. And if you got real good at it, you could produce a lot of people's books. Just an idea. I'm sure people are already doing it.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

Definitely is a market for that, Rex. And there are a number of great players who've arrived to fill the gap over the decade or so. Outlets like Page Two or Ideapress. It's a brave new world.

Expand full comment
Rowena Mabbott's avatar

As an avid reader and writer, and working on my next nonfiction project, I appreciated your insights, especially “it’s about getting clear on who and what a book is for”. I’ve been ‘stuck’ at 18k words on that project, but perhaps that’s because I’ve said everything I need to say.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

Perhaps, indeed, Rowena. It may just be saying, "yep, this is what it needs."

Expand full comment
Maureen Anderson's avatar

I used to interview authors for a radio show about career development and as such got a copy of their books to read before we chatted. Most of my guests were fantastic; most of the books could've been a fraction of the heft for the same wisdom -- as you suggest. And if I posed a question clearly inspired by something on page, say, 188? Such delight from the author/guest! Apparently few people got that far :)

Form is endlessly fascinating. I'm a fan of the essay-as-hardcover. Think A Short Guide to a Happy Life by Anna Quindlen. It carries more weight (so to speak) than a magazine piece. As for length, if someone is proposing something simple, would you trust an explanation that's complicated?

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

I've had the same experience, myself, Maureen. And, also been on the other side of it. I get both "use cases," and love the options becoming more available to make the book what it simply needs to be.

Expand full comment
Jen Mayer | Makeist's avatar

Austin Kleon’s books are a perfect example of how this could work: memorable and life-changing message delivered in a shorter word count, but added value in good design plus higher quality printing, paper and production.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

Yeah, he does a great job with his format, Jen.

Expand full comment
Alison Randle's avatar

I'm currently crafting the structure of my first book, sketching out each of the chapters, so I am very interested to read this. Listening to two author acquaintances discussing their publishers recently, I have to admit to being daunted by the publishing (and promo!) bit...

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

Excited for you, Alison. Nearly every book I've written has had a substantial change in structure through the process of writing. It's good to think about it in advance, but also hold the structure loosely and, once you're writing, let that experience tell you what it actually needs to be.

Expand full comment
Alison Randle's avatar

Thank you so much for the encouragement. I've been surprised by how many shifts there have been already. I have to say that I'm loving it!

Expand full comment
Cynthia Morris's avatar

When interviewing potential clients who want my help writing their non-fiction books, one of the questions I ask them is: Does this need to be a book?

Often I have the sense everything would be much easier for them if they explored a different format for their ideas.

But often writing a book is an important life milestone for them. Books matter to them. It has to be a book.

I love exploring different ways books can be made. I love tiny books such as Start Here Now (Susan Piver) or You are Here *For Now (Adam J Kurtz).

I celebrate different formats, and am glad you are looking at the assumptions we make about what a book needs to be. Also excited to hear you are noodging yourself back into book-making territory!

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

Love that question, Cynthia. And so agree that the process of writing what needs to be written can be such a powerful experience for the person behind the words.

Expand full comment
Cynthia Morris's avatar

Also this can point us toward indie publishing, where we can make all the decisions for ourselves. My recent book (about writing a book!) has zero stories or case studies. It's an action-oriented book. I want readers to put it down after reading a short chapter and get to writing, not be lulled into reverie contemplating stories of how other people have written.

Expand full comment
Rex Williams's avatar

That's inspiring. It means I could probably publish my book already. An editor told me I needed more case studies and stories, and then I never finished. :(

Expand full comment
Cynthia Morris's avatar

Do it, Rex. Don’t let someone with little imagination stop you from publishing your book.

Expand full comment
Dawna Brandt's avatar

Bravo! I appreciate the idea of spending 4 less hours to read a book and gaining that time for something else. I work hard at being flexible. I want authors to get more of the profits. I support you!

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

Thanks, Dawna. It's all about finding the sweet spot where everyone gets what they want and need.

Expand full comment
Laura Diane Hollingshead's avatar

This has been something I've thought about for years. Thank you for stating what I've been afraid to say!

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

Glad it helped, Laura.

Expand full comment
Janet Davies's avatar

This is really interesting. It explains why sometimes I think there’s just so much talking in this book. The ideas are great, but it takes too long to get to what I’m looking for. Like Angie said I’d be all in for a long ride with Robert MacFarlane, but that doesn’t work for everything.

It’s also interesting to me to think about value. I think I’m one of those people who would consider heft, but I’m sure there’s a happy medium. I’m still always going to buy books, the written word lands differently than a video does when I’m seeking information or wanting a particular experience.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

I LOVE a gorgeously written long fiction read, too, Janet. And totally agree, there is still something very magical about the form of a book vs other formats.

Expand full comment
Janet Davies's avatar

Magical

Exactly.

Expand full comment
Paul Millerd's avatar

I published my second book at around 35k words. People love it because that’s what it called for and they can finish it.

I really think the authors need to experiment more. All my author friends are scared to leave the traditional ecosystem after doing it once.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Fields's avatar

Love this, Paul. And, really appreciate how intentional you've been about your publishing journey from the get-go.

Expand full comment
Andrea Stoeckel's avatar

Thank you for your insight

Expand full comment